November 24, 2017

Obama DOJ Moving Quickly To Quash New Clinton Email Scandal

Loretta Lynch and the Obama Department of Justice aren’t wasting any time in moving to try and stomp on and defuse the latest Clinton e-mail scandal.

Remember how slo-oow things moved when congress wanted a subpoena complied with or someone like Judicial Watch wanted a response to an FOIA request?

Now things are going to be rushed with lightening speed in an attempt to save the corrupt Mrs. Clinton and her campaign. They may have claimed it took months to go through what was left of Hillary’s emails which totaled out at less than 5% of what they found on Weiner/Huma’s ‘s laptop. But when it comes to the 650,000 emails found on Huma and Weiner’s laptop, hey, different story.

The FBI had already said they planned to make a preliminary assessment of those 650,000 emails within several weeks. But the Obama DOJ is cracking the whip on the Bureau. Now they’re  telling  us with a straight face that the FBI will have a ‘preliminary assessment’ of Weiner’s 650,000 emails ‘within a matter of days!’

And who’s in charge of the ‘investigation’ proves the fix is already in.

(read more)

READ  Is the Sisterhood Choreographing the Harvey Weinstein Reflex?

1 Comment

  1. .
    – I’m gonna tell you the year you were born after these words — A Weiner should find
    a new hole to dive into & not pleasure self by constant in & out, going & coming, w/o protection.
    If Anthony did contact HC by email, it’d probably be 1st time she’d come in contact with A Weiner.

    Dude, take my advice. Run & hide bc if H thinks u cost her election, u in danger- like Mr Assange. HC’s squirreled away $2Bil offshore, she’ll have the $ to hire all the hitters for all her haters. Security caught one scaling Assange’s Embsy but he, ‘got away.’ Police response time- 2hrs. Police distance by foot-120 secs. Hmmm.

    Re MedBias: TheWeatherChannel is completely biased. They don’t even try to disguise their pro-weather far-wing agenda. It’s clear because of high pressure, they’re a front for Big Weather.

    1)Think of a disgusting person. If they scream- ‘A meteor is going to hit US in 4 hours!’ Do you say- ‘They’re disgusting so I’m not gonna even see if it’s true?’ 2) A low IQ man says 4+4=8. Do u say- ‘His IQ is so low, 8 can’t be right.’ Which is more important: The source, or info’s accuracy?

    Even if known liar HC or Donna Brazile told me a meteor was about to strike the US, I’m not gonna stand around bc I distrust the source, bet cash money- I’m gonna find out if it’s true!

    The weak attempts by Dems to convince us to ignore truths being revealed by WLks- ‘bc they were unfairly obtained.’ – almost makes tears well up in my eyes.

    Dems want us to ignore the ems bc they claim Russia’s behind them. So the hell what? Even giving the Dems benefit of the doubt, Russ didn’t write the ems, they just hacked ‘um & gave them to us.

    I don’t know their source. I DO know Dems don’t contest their accuracy. They don’t even go, ‘Nuh uh!’ when confronted. They just throw up ‘Jazz Hands’ & shout, ‘RUSSIA!’ – Like that matters. Just how stupid do we are they think?

    Bible has 66 books. Subtract your age from 66, & add 50-the year you were born. Speaking of witches, shame on you DonBrazile for dragging Christ’s Holy Name thru the mud when you invoked your so-called Christianity while lying to MegKelly about giving Clinton camp questions. You’re not only a liar, you support the murder/dismemberment of babies. WWJD? You may sit in a pew on Sunday, but that doesn’t make you a Christian.
    .

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Comments are closed.