December 11, 2017

The Holy Inquisition of Political Correctness and toxicity

Watching the goings-on in the modern academia is a hazardous occupation. From the point of view of many actors on that scene, all they are doing is cleaning the scene of “toxicity” – real or imaginary. The viewer, though, gets the full dose of the toxicity directly in his/her face… but it is rather a personal complaint.

Here is a really heart-wrenching example of the juggernaut of Political Correctness squashing under its wheels an innocent and well meaning young person. Because of some overly sensitive human embryo, whose pea brain and overwhelming sensitivity and entitlement don’t bear a shadow of debate.

Lindsay Shepherd, a graduate student at Wilfrid Laurier University, said she ran afoul of school authorities after she aired a clip in two tutorials of a debate on gender-neutral pronouns featuring polarizing University of Toronto professor Jordan Peterson.

At this point I feel the need to stop for a moment and to explain. Jordan Peterson is a Canadian clinical psychologist, cultural critic, and professor of psychology at the University of Toronto. His ascent to notoriety came with his opposition to the use of genderless pronouns and his attacks on political correctness. Here he explains some of his views.

Now, does Lindsay Shepherd share the views of the illustrious professor? Not at all, rather the opposite:

Shepherd said she was trying to demonstrate that the structure of a language can affect the society in which it is spoken in ways people might not anticipate. To illustrate her point, she said she mentioned that long-standing views on gender had probably been shaped by the gender-specific pronouns that are part of English’s fundamental grammatical structure. The clip of Peterson debating sexual diversity scholar Nicholas Matte, she said, was meant to demonstrate ways in which the existence of gender-specific pronouns has caused controversy.

So, her crime was not in expressing support for the professor’s views – just in showing a clip where his views are explained to the pupils. That’s all, but this was sufficient for the faculty Inquisition** to open a so called “investigation”, when one of the students complained.

READ  Mahmoud Abbas's Lies On Israel And The Balfour Declaration, Debunked

And here are the results:

She said she was permitted to keep her position so long as she agreed to file copies of her lesson plans in advance and allow faculty members to sit in on her sessions whenever they wished, constraints she said are not standard practice for Laurier.

Mind-boggling, isn’t it? And here is what the proud institution says about itself:

“Laurier is committed to fostering a learning environment that is open and challenging, protects academic freedom and freedom of expression, as well as being welcoming, supportive and respectful of human rights,” the school said in a statement.

Here goes* your “open and challenging” and here go your “academic freedom” and “freedom of expression”…

In this article you can listen to a partial recording (made in secret, I understand) of the meeting between Ms Shepherd and faculty. It was quite painful to me for personal reasons, having being present at several Soviet meetings of this kind. The chief interlocutor (the male voice in the recording), with his incessant probing and incessant attempts to detect the crime in Ms Shepherd’s words, is chilling. Here is a really toxic character.

I was thinking about historical parallels. It will be a gross exaggeration to compare the treatment of Ms Shepherd to the Stalin’s trials. After all, the results were almost immediate execution of the “enemies of the people”. But two other similar cases come to mind: McCarthyism and its frequently baseless punishment of innocents. And the Soviet times public (lead by Communist party) denouncements of everyone who crossed the imaginary line, which could be just telling a joke considered “anti-Soviet”, or writing a politically incorrect article, or…

READ  No more borders? Imagine that...

In short, McCarthyism that is coming back under a new guise and is promoted by another breed of PC priests.

Too bad.

(*) At least there is a voice of protest from Wilfrid Laurier. Good for you, professor Haskell!

(**) And let’s listen a bit to one of the Inquisitors, part of the above mentioned “investigation” committee.

Dr. Pimlott is currently working on an anthology of Karl Marx’s journalism as well as developing research on strategic communications and social justice movements in Canada.

Any questions?

About Snoopy 18 Articles

Snoopy the Goon grew up in the Soviet Union, and now lives in Israel. He blogs at Simply Jews

2 Comments

  1. Totally agree with you, but have a bit of a quibble.

    McCarthy was, in general, correct in his accusations. Many of the people he accused of being communists, were, in fact, communists.

    How awful our universities have become with these tenured professors thinking themselves God of their own universe.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  2. I have to say that I wanted to add a remark saying exactly what you pointed out re McCarthy. However, with an important proviso: his activity swept a lot of people having nothing to do with commies, punishing them for being slightly pink or saying the wrong thing at the wrong time.

    I have decided to skip that in this post due to its excessive length.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Comments are closed.