<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weekend Weasel: Sharia Apologists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.watcherofweasels.org/weekend-weasel-sharia-apologists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.watcherofweasels.org/weekend-weasel-sharia-apologists/</link>
	<description>Keeping an eye on the weasels of the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:25:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheat Seeking Missiles &#187; Sharia Just A Way To Arbitrate Domestic Squabbles?</title>
		<link>http://www.watcherofweasels.org/weekend-weasel-sharia-apologists/comment-page-1/#comment-1504</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheat Seeking Missiles &#187; Sharia Just A Way To Arbitrate Domestic Squabbles?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 19:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.watcherofweasels.org/?p=732#comment-1504</guid>
		<description>[...] week&#8217;s post, Weekend Weasel: Sharia Apologists, is a great read, setting up a conversation with Mrs. Weasels and a relative with the quaint name [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week&#8217;s post, Weekend Weasel: Sharia Apologists, is a great read, setting up a conversation with Mrs. Weasels and a relative with the quaint name [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Watcher</title>
		<link>http://www.watcherofweasels.org/weekend-weasel-sharia-apologists/comment-page-1/#comment-1500</link>
		<dc:creator>The Watcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 01:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.watcherofweasels.org/?p=732#comment-1500</guid>
		<description>Hi Debbie, Tell me about it. It is clear that Western feminists were concerned solely with self promotion and carefully selected agenda. Having achieved much of what they sought out to get they today&#039;s elder stateswomen of feminism decided to forgo other societies whose women are much more oppressed than they were as young girls in the sixties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Debbie, Tell me about it. It is clear that Western feminists were concerned solely with self promotion and carefully selected agenda. Having achieved much of what they sought out to get they today&#8217;s elder stateswomen of feminism decided to forgo other societies whose women are much more oppressed than they were as young girls in the sixties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right Truth</title>
		<link>http://www.watcherofweasels.org/weekend-weasel-sharia-apologists/comment-page-1/#comment-1495</link>
		<dc:creator>Right Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 19:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.watcherofweasels.org/?p=732#comment-1495</guid>
		<description>Western feminists don&#039;t care about women in Islam, it&#039;s obvious.  They have had years of chances to voice their protest -- nothing but silence from them.

The West if full of these useful idiots, and out present administration is also full of them and those with close attachments to Islam, the Muslim Brotherhood.  Very scary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Western feminists don&#8217;t care about women in Islam, it&#8217;s obvious.  They have had years of chances to voice their protest &#8212; nothing but silence from them.</p>
<p>The West if full of these useful idiots, and out present administration is also full of them and those with close attachments to Islam, the Muslim Brotherhood.  Very scary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Watcher</title>
		<link>http://www.watcherofweasels.org/weekend-weasel-sharia-apologists/comment-page-1/#comment-1494</link>
		<dc:creator>The Watcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.watcherofweasels.org/?p=732#comment-1494</guid>
		<description>Amen Little Fox. Unfortunately there exists so many examples that we could fill volumes of texts up with documentation. Sadly that still wouldn&#039;t get through to other muttonheads on the left. 

A common defense is what I like to call the sleight of hand shell game defense where the muttonheads fall back on the crusades; seemingly oblivious to the fact that the crusades were a response to the Muslim conquest of a majority of the Christian population at the time. A twofer in my book, having to go so far in time to justify Muslim aggression while getting it wrong in the first place. (and yes begging forgiveness from the victims of the crusades even though the left really isn&#039;t connected to it in any way, shape or form).

All in all the ignorance of the left is quite possibly the best tool our enemies have in transforming America from the world&#039;s greatest superpower into a feeble defenseless nation. The left prefers that we are the least common denominator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen Little Fox. Unfortunately there exists so many examples that we could fill volumes of texts up with documentation. Sadly that still wouldn&#8217;t get through to other muttonheads on the left. </p>
<p>A common defense is what I like to call the sleight of hand shell game defense where the muttonheads fall back on the crusades; seemingly oblivious to the fact that the crusades were a response to the Muslim conquest of a majority of the Christian population at the time. A twofer in my book, having to go so far in time to justify Muslim aggression while getting it wrong in the first place. (and yes begging forgiveness from the victims of the crusades even though the left really isn&#8217;t connected to it in any way, shape or form).</p>
<p>All in all the ignorance of the left is quite possibly the best tool our enemies have in transforming America from the world&#8217;s greatest superpower into a feeble defenseless nation. The left prefers that we are the least common denominator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: littlefox</title>
		<link>http://www.watcherofweasels.org/weekend-weasel-sharia-apologists/comment-page-1/#comment-1493</link>
		<dc:creator>littlefox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.watcherofweasels.org/?p=732#comment-1493</guid>
		<description>How could you have left out the sickening practice of public stonings mostly against WOMEN. Muttonhead, with her feminist sensibilities, should be outraged that a religion is allowed to slaughter women for simply trying to explore their sexual freedom. I mean, I know Muttonhead thinks birth control should be available to all....what about those women? Their only form of birth control is &quot;submit to your husband or face the stones in the public square&quot;. What about the Muslimas rights to free love? What about their rights to &quot;go wild&quot; in Cancun on Spring Break if they should so choose? Do you think any Muslima living under Sharia has ever been able to trade a boob flash for a string of plastic beads? Talk about oppression! Muttonhead is not looking at the clear picture. Here are a group of women who have yet to be LIBERATED by liberal women! There&#039;s actually something for feminists to do now! Go liberate the oppressed Muslimas! Liberate them from the stonings and the rape and the forced genital mutilation. Liberate them and send them to Marti Gras with the rest of the &quot;liberated&quot; women they did such a good job with here. But will any feminists stand up for the Muslimas? Ulikely. Because they are faced with the ultimate dilema. Human rights vs. tolerance. You can&#039;t continue to be &quot;tolerant&quot; of the great religion of peace if you acknowledge that it partakes in human rights violations...and if you admit that it does in fact violate the rights of women and homosexuals, you then open that big can of worms I like to call, &quot;Bush was right.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How could you have left out the sickening practice of public stonings mostly against WOMEN. Muttonhead, with her feminist sensibilities, should be outraged that a religion is allowed to slaughter women for simply trying to explore their sexual freedom. I mean, I know Muttonhead thinks birth control should be available to all&#8230;.what about those women? Their only form of birth control is &#8220;submit to your husband or face the stones in the public square&#8221;. What about the Muslimas rights to free love? What about their rights to &#8220;go wild&#8221; in Cancun on Spring Break if they should so choose? Do you think any Muslima living under Sharia has ever been able to trade a boob flash for a string of plastic beads? Talk about oppression! Muttonhead is not looking at the clear picture. Here are a group of women who have yet to be LIBERATED by liberal women! There&#8217;s actually something for feminists to do now! Go liberate the oppressed Muslimas! Liberate them from the stonings and the rape and the forced genital mutilation. Liberate them and send them to Marti Gras with the rest of the &#8220;liberated&#8221; women they did such a good job with here. But will any feminists stand up for the Muslimas? Ulikely. Because they are faced with the ultimate dilema. Human rights vs. tolerance. You can&#8217;t continue to be &#8220;tolerant&#8221; of the great religion of peace if you acknowledge that it partakes in human rights violations&#8230;and if you admit that it does in fact violate the rights of women and homosexuals, you then open that big can of worms I like to call, &#8220;Bush was right.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->